|
|
Post by General Smithers on Mar 6, 2016 7:11:11 GMT
Housebound
It was ok, mildly funny in places. The older lady in the house reminded me so much of one of my Aunts. The way she spoke was exactly like her so that was amusing.
|
|
|
|
Post by SicJes on Mar 7, 2016 14:03:16 GMT
I watched Elysium last night and it was better then I thought it would be. I really hate Matt Damon but was able to tollerate him for once. The movie is very dirty and gritty. Makes you feel like you are suffocating while you watch it.
Great Sci-fi action. Some cool gore. And a great story.
2 thumbs up.
|
|
|
|
Post by 6StringAddict on Mar 7, 2016 14:39:56 GMT
Macbeth - Holy boring suckballs
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2016 15:32:21 GMT
Anomalisa
Pretty boring stuff 2/5
|
|
|
|
Post by General Smithers on Mar 7, 2016 15:44:01 GMT
I watched Elysium last night and it was better then I thought it would be. I really hate Matt Damon but was able to tollerate him for once. The movie is very dirty and gritty. Makes you feel like you are suffocating while you watch it. Great Sci-fi action. Some cool gore. And a great story. 2 thumbs up. I love the South African bad guy in that movie, hes hilarious. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2016 16:43:04 GMT
Macbeth - Holy boring suckballs Watch the Polanski version |
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Mar 8, 2016 0:43:17 GMT
The brothers Grimsby - Hahaha, it was hilarious.  I laughed so much at times I got tears in my eyes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kimbo on Mar 8, 2016 17:03:18 GMT
The Visit - Never really went anywhere, pretty bad ending too
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2016 23:02:06 GMT
Tron & Tron Legacy. Both Great.
|
|
|
|
Post by icedguardian on Mar 9, 2016 13:27:05 GMT
The Monuments Men
I knew this wasn't supposed to be good, but based on the cast and the plot I was really hoping the hate wasn't warranted so I checked it out on Netflix. Yep it's bad, and I only made it halfway through.
|
|
|
|
Post by inaudiblewhisper on Mar 9, 2016 13:33:26 GMT
10 Cloverfield Lane getting pretty great reviews. No Cloverfield monster by the way. I think Abrams wants the Cloverfield name to be a high concept, low budget anthology series like The Twilight Zone, with some loose connections and themes. |
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Mar 9, 2016 15:00:37 GMT
10 Cloverfield Lane getting pretty great reviews. No Cloverfield monster by the way. I think Abrams wants the Cloverfield name to be a high concept, low budget anthology series like The Twilight Zone, with some loose connections and themes. Uhm...isn't there a spoiler in your post? |
|
|
|
Post by inaudiblewhisper on Mar 9, 2016 15:10:20 GMT
The fact that it isn't a direct sequel to Cloverfield and doesn't feature the monster? Abrams has been saying all that in interviews for a couple of weeks now. You can't really spoil what a film isn't. Outside of that, I know literally nothing about the movie other than the trailer, so there's nothing for me to spoil.
|
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Mar 9, 2016 15:51:51 GMT
The fact that it isn't a direct sequel to Cloverfield and doesn't feature the monster? Abrams has been saying all that in interviews for a couple of weeks now. You can't really spoil what a film isn't. Outside of that, I know literally nothing about the movie other than the trailer, so there's nothing for me to spoil. I was referring to the no monster part. |
|
|
|
Post by inaudiblewhisper on Mar 9, 2016 16:06:18 GMT
There might be a monster, it just isn't the one from the first film. That's been known for a while now. Abrams two weeks ago: "This movie is very purposefully not called Cloverfield 2, because it's not Cloverfield 2. The association is clear and there are multiple connections – and there is a bigger idea at play for us with these movies and this connection. And while the Cloverfield monster isn't in this movie, there's something else that happens… but I don't want to ruin it"
|
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Mar 9, 2016 17:32:12 GMT
There might be a monster, it just isn't the one from the first film. That's been known for a while now. Abrams two weeks ago: "This movie is very purposefully not called Cloverfield 2, because it's not Cloverfield 2. The association is clear and there are multiple connections – and there is a bigger idea at play for us with these movies and this connection. And while the Cloverfield monster isn't in this movie, there's something else that happens… but I don't want to ruin it" Oh, okay, I see. Gotcha. |
|
|
|
Post by Kimbo on Mar 10, 2016 13:21:56 GMT
There might be a monster, it just isn't the one from the first film. That's been known for a while now. Abrams two weeks ago: "This movie is very purposefully not called Cloverfield 2, because it's not Cloverfield 2. The association is clear and there are multiple connections – and there is a bigger idea at play for us with these movies and this connection. And while the Cloverfield monster isn't in this movie, there's something else that happens… but I don't want to ruin it" Not to be a dick, but you actually spoiled it for me, I'm not going to the theater now. I purposely avoided to read anything about the movie because I didn't wanna know. Anyways you probably did me a favor in the end because I had hoped the monster would appear in the movie. Just remember in the future that not everybody reads every interview about movies :) |
|
|
|
Post by inaudiblewhisper on Mar 10, 2016 13:37:16 GMT
There might be a monster, it just isn't the one from the first film. That's been known for a while now. Abrams two weeks ago: "This movie is very purposefully not called Cloverfield 2, because it's not Cloverfield 2. The association is clear and there are multiple connections – and there is a bigger idea at play for us with these movies and this connection. And while the Cloverfield monster isn't in this movie, there's something else that happens… but I don't want to ruin it" Not to be a dick, but you actually spoiled it for me, I'm not going to the theater now. I purposely avoided to read anything about the movie because I didn't wanna know. Anyways you probably did me a favor in the end because I had hoped the monster would appear in the movie. Just remember in the future that not everybody reads every interview about movies :) Well I'm sorry if you didn't want to know, but if your only expectation from the movie was the cloverfield monster, why wouldn't you want to avoid disappoint beforehand? If it was in the movie, I wouldn't wanna know either, I'd want it to be a surprise, but knowing what the movie isn't doesn't spoil the movie it just readjusts expectations. It's in half of the review blurbs on Rotten Tomatoes so it's not something that is supposed to be a surprise. You should totally still go see it at the cinema; it's getting fantastic reviews (even better than the first film), and the third act is seemingly insane. |
|
|
|
Post by 6StringAddict on Mar 10, 2016 15:24:47 GMT
In The Heart Of The Sea - I thought it was OK.
|
|
|
|
Post by SicJes on Mar 10, 2016 15:46:05 GMT
I'm going to the movies this Sunday with my wife and am 95% sure we are going to see Cloverfield since there is really not much else besides Dead Pool, we were going to see Starwars but it happenes to be getting pulled from our cinimas this week. So if Cloverfield is any good and not just hyped up I'll fill you guys in.
|
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Mar 10, 2016 19:19:04 GMT
I'm going to the movies this Sunday with my wife and am 95% sure we are going to see Cloverfield since there is really not much else besides Dead Pool, we were going to see Starwars but it happenes to be getting pulled from our cinimas this week. So if Cloverfield is any good and not just hyped up I'll fill you guys in. Dead Pool is great! |
|
|
|
Post by Kimbo on Mar 10, 2016 22:35:02 GMT
Not to be a dick, but you actually spoiled it for me, I'm not going to the theater now. I purposely avoided to read anything about the movie because I didn't wanna know. Anyways you probably did me a favor in the end because I had hoped the monster would appear in the movie. Just remember in the future that not everybody reads every interview about movies :) Well I'm sorry if you didn't want to know, but if your only expectation from the movie was the cloverfield monster, why wouldn't you want to avoid disappoint beforehand? If it was in the movie, I wouldn't wanna know either, I'd want it to be a surprise, but knowing what the movie isn't doesn't spoil the movie it just readjusts expectations. It's in half of the review blurbs on Rotten Tomatoes so it's not something that is supposed to be a surprise. You should totally still go see it at the cinema; it's getting fantastic reviews (even better than the first film), and the third act is seemingly insane. I just really like big monsters  Hmm that third act does sound promising, maybe I'll go watch it anyways. |
|
|
|
Post by Kimbo on Mar 10, 2016 22:36:11 GMT
In The Heart Of The Sea - I thought it was OK. I had great expectations to that movie and I too thought it was OK, but I also feel like they could have done so much more with it. |
|
|
|
Post by inaudiblewhisper on Mar 10, 2016 23:57:51 GMT
Well I'm sorry if you didn't want to know, but if your only expectation from the movie was the cloverfield monster, why wouldn't you want to avoid disappoint beforehand? If it was in the movie, I wouldn't wanna know either, I'd want it to be a surprise, but knowing what the movie isn't doesn't spoil the movie it just readjusts expectations. It's in half of the review blurbs on Rotten Tomatoes so it's not something that is supposed to be a surprise. You should totally still go see it at the cinema; it's getting fantastic reviews (even better than the first film), and the third act is seemingly insane. I just really like big monsters Hmm that third act does sound promising, maybe I'll go watch it anyways. Maybe there is a monster, Abrams only said it isn't a direct sequel to the first movie. For all we know the connection between the movies is that they're about big monsters, just not the same one. |
|
|
|
Post by Fix Me on Mar 10, 2016 23:59:41 GMT
10 Cloverfield Lane - I saw it last night, I really liked it. I didn't enjoy Cloverfield, but I love John Goodman and I got a free pass. John Goodman was excellent as usual. It's a much different movie than the original Cloverfield.
The director, Dan Trachtenberg, made this Portal short:
|
|
|
|
Post by 6StringAddict on Mar 11, 2016 10:41:13 GMT
In The Heart Of The Sea - I thought it was OK. I had great expectations to that movie and I too thought it was OK, but I also feel like they could have done so much more with it. I thought it was about Moby Dick. Instead it was about a story which led to the Moby Dick book. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2016 16:20:15 GMT
Excalibur (1981)
A bit silly but very enjoyable. Merlin was great.
3.5/5
|
|
|
|
Post by Baba Yaga on Mar 11, 2016 16:27:34 GMT
When is this Star Wars HD torrent dropping? Been waiting for a while now. They're protecting that copy more then the...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2016 21:09:29 GMT
The Monuments MenI knew this wasn't supposed to be good, but based on the cast and the plot I was really hoping the hate wasn't warranted so I checked it out on Netflix. Yep it's bad, and I only made it halfway through. I saw that in theaters, it was absolutely horrible. |
|
|
|
Post by icedguardian on Mar 12, 2016 0:04:08 GMT
The Monuments MenI knew this wasn't supposed to be good, but based on the cast and the plot I was really hoping the hate wasn't warranted so I checked it out on Netflix. Yep it's bad, and I only made it halfway through. I saw that in theaters, it was absolutely horrible. Darn. I'm sorry you went for that. It is horrible. HOW it could be that horrible is just beyond me. |
|
I laughed so much at times I got tears in my eyes.
