|
|
Post by Alan-P on Jan 12, 2018 12:42:15 GMT
The purple woman keeping the plan from Poe was necessary to allow Finn to have a part in this movie. If Poe knew the plan, then there would have been no need for Finn to have been in the movie, nor Rose, nor Del Toro's character, nor the entirety of the Casino land and the little bit about arms dealers selling weapons to both the rebels and the empire. PS I am pretty sure that the Empire would have the means to develop it's own weapons, it built 3 fucking Death Stars ffs. but Alan Finn & Rose didn't even get into contact with the hacker, it was a waste of time. 30 minutes of my time. if they had of hooked up with him, cool This is also true. Also Why would there have been any romantic story between Rose and FInn, when Finn has spent the entirety of the last movie lusting after Rey and even wakes up in this movie and the first thing he's thinking is Rey.
Why does Rose or Disney think that Finn should share his affections with Rose just because she's a woman and that's what she wants.
This reminds me of a twtter conversation my missus showed me of a bloke being called transphobic because he said he was not sexually attracted to and did not want to, kiss a transexual.
Or doesit? I'm not really sure, i'm still rather quite delirious with this flu. |
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Jan 12, 2018 14:01:59 GMT
Basically all the things you (BigBunny and Alan-P) are mentioning about it are some of the major stuff that bothered me with the movie...it's frustrating 'cause it just should've been better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Jan 12, 2018 14:39:01 GMT
Basically all the things you (BigBunny and Alan-P) are mentioning about it are some of the major stuff that bothered me with the movie...it's frustrating 'cause it just should've been better. Here's the problem |
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Jan 12, 2018 14:46:55 GMT
Basically all the things you (BigBunny and Alan-P) are mentioning about it are some of the major stuff that bothered me with the movie...it's frustrating 'cause it just should've been better. Here's the problem I love The Force awakens, so that's probably not it for me. |
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Jan 12, 2018 15:50:10 GMT
I love The Force awakens, so that's probably not it for me. She's taking things too far, it's for all of us. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2018 13:06:40 GMT
Your favourite Star Wars scene?
|
|
|
|
Post by BigBunny on Feb 1, 2018 6:21:36 GMT
Obi Wan fights better that Qui Gon... yet he's a padawan at that time  |
|
|
|
Post by BigBunny on Feb 13, 2018 10:11:36 GMT
HISHE have come up with a better ending to the film
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2018 13:26:47 GMT
Maz Kanata was as bad a character as Jar Jar Binks.   |
|
|
|
Post by BigBunny on Feb 18, 2018 13:14:32 GMT
^ this is a compilation of youtube rants about TLJ. it's worth watching  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 12:31:23 GMT
Ratings for the new films?
Force Awakens 5/10
Rogue One 4/10
Last Jedi 7/10
(The OG trilogy - New Hope 8/10, Empire 9/10, Jedi 8/10)
(Prequels - Phantom 7.5/10, Clones 6/10, Sith 7/10)
|
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Feb 20, 2018 14:29:45 GMT
Something like this:
1. Return of The Jedi 9/10
2. The Empire strikes back 8,5/10
3. The Force awakens 8/10
4. A New hope 7,5/10
5. Revenge of The Sith 7/10
6. Rogue one 6,5/10
7. The Phantom menace 5,5/10
8. The Last Jedi 5/10
9. Attack of The Clones 4/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Feb 20, 2018 14:48:22 GMT
Something like this: The Force awakens - 8/10 Rogue one - 6,5/10 The Last Jedi - 5/10 (A New hope 7,5/10, The Empire strikes back 8,5/10, Return of The Jedi 9/10) The Force awakens - 7/10 Rogue one - 5/10 The Last Jedi - This is a strange one. As a stand alone star wars story I'd say over all i enjoyed it. Too much militant feminism resulting in nonsensical writing and shoehorned diversity, there was also plot holes you could drive a titanic through like how did Del Toro know about the plan to use transports to abandon the cruiser and tell the empire, when Fin/, Rose (fucking Rose, the most pointless and token character of all time) and Poe had no idea that was the plan. but when it was good I enjoyed it. I'd give it, as a stand alone 8/10. As part of a trilogy - Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy inexplicably took a giant shit from a massive height onto 40 years of story telling, literally crapping over the entirety of The Force Awakens plot, and instead of being in a position of the 2nd act of a trilogy, we're now going to start the 3rd act with next to everything undone and it may as well be back at the start. - 2/10 A New hope 10/10, The Empire strikes back 10/10 Return of The Jedi 7.5/10 Phantom Menace - 0/10 Attack of the Clones - 0/10 Revenge of the Sith - 0/10 |
|
|
|
Post by lightning master on Feb 20, 2018 14:54:13 GMT
As part of a trilogy - Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy inexplicably took a giant shit from a massive height onto 40 years of story telling, literally crapping over the entirety of The Force Awakens plot, and instead of being in a position of the 2nd act of a trilogy, we're now going to start the 3rd act with next to everything undone and it may as well be back at the start. - 2/10  I so much wish you would be wrong here... |
|
|
|
Post by FightFireWithStAnger on Feb 20, 2018 15:11:50 GMT
This is my ranking for all of the one's I have seen. I'm not gonna even acknowledge the "new trilogy". To me, Star Wars ended with Return of the Jedi. That ending was good as any.
1. Empire Strikes Back (That scene with the AT-AT's attacking the base, especially that opening shot of them coming out of the blizzard is badass.)
2. A New Hope (I can't think of any better entrance for a villain than having a 7 foot tall guy in black armor massacring a bunch of soldiers with a red lightsaber on a ship.)
3. Return of the Jedi (The end battle, and that huge ass Star Destroyer crashing into the Death Star.)
4. Revenge of the Sith (The ending lightsaber duel was probably the best part of that whole prequel trilogy. That was awesome especially if you found out that the two actors did that themselves and trained for hours, dedication.)
5. Attack of the Clones (Sir Christopher Lee fighting a little green man was pretty cool.)
6. The Phantom Menace (The end lightsaber duel by far. I believe that Jar Jar Binks is a Sith Lord.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 16:15:03 GMT
Something like this: 1. Return of The Jedi 9/10 2. The Empire strikes back 8,5/10 3. The Force awakens 8/10 4. A New hope 7,5/10 5. Revenge of The Sith 7/10 6. Rogue one 6,5/10 7. The Phantom menace 5,5/10 8. The Last Jedi 5/10 9. Attack of The Clones 4/10 Return of the Jedi better than Empire Strikes Back? Interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by waunakonor on Feb 23, 2018 4:11:53 GMT
What does that even mean? Are you seriously pulling an HR and complaining about too many women? As part of a trilogy - Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy inexplicably took a giant shit from a massive height onto 40 years of story telling, literally crapping over the entirety of The Force Awakens plot, and instead of being in a position of the 2nd act of a trilogy, we're now going to start the 3rd act with next to everything undone and it may as well be back at the start. - 2/10 Except for all the characters who have been introduced and development and had their relationships and conflicts with one another explored? The characters are clearly in different places from where they were at the start, so saying we might as well be back at the start makes no sense. Nothing was "crapped on," just looked at in a new light. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2018 4:56:04 GMT
What does that even mean? Are you seriously pulling an HR and complaining about too many women? As part of a trilogy - Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy inexplicably took a giant shit from a massive height onto 40 years of story telling, literally crapping over the entirety of The Force Awakens plot, and instead of being in a position of the 2nd act of a trilogy, we're now going to start the 3rd act with next to everything undone and it may as well be back at the start. - 2/10 Except for all the characters who have been introduced and development and had their relationships and conflicts with one another explored? The characters are clearly in different places from where they were at the start, so saying we might as well be back at the start makes no sense. Nothing was "crapped on," just looked at in a new light. There does seem to be a feminist agenda with the new films, i've tried to look past it. |
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Feb 23, 2018 7:27:26 GMT
What does that even mean? Are you seriously pulling an HR and complaining about too many women? As part of a trilogy - Rian Johnson and Kathleen Kennedy inexplicably took a giant shit from a massive height onto 40 years of story telling, literally crapping over the entirety of The Force Awakens plot, and instead of being in a position of the 2nd act of a trilogy, we're now going to start the 3rd act with next to everything undone and it may as well be back at the start. - 2/10 Except for all the characters who have been introduced and development and had their relationships and conflicts with one another explored? The characters are clearly in different places from where they were at the start, so saying we might as well be back at the start makes no sense. Nothing was "crapped on," just looked at in a new light. Developed? The time line from Force Awakens to this movie is about 3 days Rey goes from collecting scrap on Jakku to besting Luke Skywalker before the week is out, and then rather than some revelation that she's of some pedigree Jedi master race to be that powerful, her parents were just junkers. What awesome character development... Finn does nothing, in fact he's only written into this movie because he was popular in the first, his entire presence is inconsequential to the plot. Poe didn't really do much again, except have his penis put in place by purple hair. Back to movie writing 101 with you. And if you can't see the feminist agenda in the symbolism, let alone that purple Broad, then what can I tell you? It's nothing to do with women, it's the portrayal. Liea was a bad mother fucker, she'd give han some shit, but he didn't roll over like a good boy and her make some sarcastic quip, no he would give her shit back. We call that equality. This is Star Wars, not a platform for Kathleen Kennedy to push her personal agenda. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2018 20:03:02 GMT
What does that even mean? Are you seriously pulling an HR and complaining about too many women? Except for all the characters who have been introduced and development and had their relationships and conflicts with one another explored? The characters are clearly in different places from where they were at the start, so saying we might as well be back at the start makes no sense. Nothing was "crapped on," just looked at in a new light. Developed? The time line from Force Awakens to this movie is about 3 days Rey goes from collecting scrap on Jakku to besting Luke Skywalker before the week is out, and then rather than some revelation that she's of some pedigree Jedi master race to be that powerful, her parents were just junkers. What awesome character development... Finn does nothing, in fact he's only written into this movie because he was popular in the first, his entire presence is inconsequential to the plot. Poe didn't really do much again, except have his penis put in place by purple hair. Back to movie writing 101 with you. And if you can't see the feminist agenda in the symbolism, let alone that purple Broad, then what can I tell you? It's nothing to do with women, it's the portrayal. Liea was a bad mother fucker, she'd give han some shit, but he didn't roll over like a good boy and her make some sarcastic quip, no he would give her shit back. We call that equality. This is Star Wars, not a platform for Kathleen Kennedy to push her personal agenda. Out of the new characters i only liked Kylo Ren, the rest were shite. |
|
|
|
Post by BigBunny on Feb 26, 2018 10:08:13 GMT
What does that even mean? Are you seriously pulling an HR and complaining about too many women? Except for all the characters who have been introduced and development and had their relationships and conflicts with one another explored? The characters are clearly in different places from where they were at the start, so saying we might as well be back at the start makes no sense. Nothing was "crapped on," just looked at in a new light. Developed? The time line from Force Awakens to this movie is about 3 days Rey goes from collecting scrap on Jakku to besting Luke Skywalker before the week is out, and then rather than some revelation that she's of some pedigree Jedi master race to be that powerful, her parents were just junkers. What awesome character development... Finn does nothing, in fact he's only written into this movie because he was popular in the first, his entire presence is inconsequential to the plot. Poe didn't really do much again, except have his penis put in place by purple hair. Back to movie writing 101 with you. And if you can't see the feminist agenda in the symbolism, let alone that purple Broad, then what can I tell you? It's nothing to do with women, it's the portrayal. Liea was a bad mother fucker, she'd give han some shit, but he didn't roll over like a good boy and her make some sarcastic quip, no he would give her shit back. We call that equality. This is Star Wars, not a platform for Kathleen Kennedy to push her personal agenda. Laura Dern's character Holdo aka: the walking popstick with purple fairy floss on top was unnecessary. she was a complete waste of space. Finn who I liked in the TFA becomes an absolute joke. wasting time on Las Vegas planet with Rose who's entire role in the movie was to annoy the sh*t out of me. Rose is the Jar Jar Binks of TLJ. Rose stopping Finn from sacrificing himself was so f*cking stupid. so because Rose has a crush on Finn, all of the Resistance should die?? has anyone seen that photo of Kathleen Kennedy with a group of young women and they are wearing t-shirts that say "the force is female"?  |
|
|
|
Post by spartanmcdoodle on Feb 26, 2018 11:26:56 GMT
What does that even mean? Are you seriously pulling an HR and complaining about too many women? Except for all the characters who have been introduced and development and had their relationships and conflicts with one another explored? The characters are clearly in different places from where they were at the start, so saying we might as well be back at the start makes no sense. Nothing was "crapped on," just looked at in a new light. Developed? The time line from Force Awakens to this movie is about 3 days Rey goes from collecting scrap on Jakku to besting Luke Skywalker before the week is out, and then rather than some revelation that she's of some pedigree Jedi master race to be that powerful, her parents were just junkers. What awesome character development... Finn does nothing, in fact he's only written into this movie because he was popular in the first, his entire presence is inconsequential to the plot. Poe didn't really do much again, except have his penis put in place by purple hair. Back to movie writing 101 with you. And if you can't see the feminist agenda in the symbolism, let alone that purple Broad, then what can I tell you? It's nothing to do with women, it's the portrayal. Liea was a bad mother fucker, she'd give han some shit, but he didn't roll over like a good boy and her make some sarcastic quip, no he would give her shit back. We call that equality. This is Star Wars, not a platform for Kathleen Kennedy to push her personal agenda. Personally, I saw her and leias condescension to Poe coming from a place of age, experience and wisdom. Not vaginas. |
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Feb 26, 2018 12:56:52 GMT
Developed? The time line from Force Awakens to this movie is about 3 days Rey goes from collecting scrap on Jakku to besting Luke Skywalker before the week is out, and then rather than some revelation that she's of some pedigree Jedi master race to be that powerful, her parents were just junkers. What awesome character development... Finn does nothing, in fact he's only written into this movie because he was popular in the first, his entire presence is inconsequential to the plot. Poe didn't really do much again, except have his penis put in place by purple hair. Back to movie writing 101 with you. And if you can't see the feminist agenda in the symbolism, let alone that purple Broad, then what can I tell you? It's nothing to do with women, it's the portrayal. Liea was a bad mother fucker, she'd give han some shit, but he didn't roll over like a good boy and her make some sarcastic quip, no he would give her shit back. We call that equality. This is Star Wars, not a platform for Kathleen Kennedy to push her personal agenda. Personally, I saw her and leias condescension to Poe coming from a place of age, experience and wisdom. Not vaginas.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2018 15:17:52 GMT
Sometimes i wish they leaved the original trilogy alone.
The new films just get worse and worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Feb 26, 2018 16:20:17 GMT
It amazes me they manage to fuck it up so badly.
It's like fucking up mashed potatoes...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2018 17:34:01 GMT
It amazes me they manage to fuck it up so badly. It's like fucking up mashed potatoes... Last Jedi wasn't too bad but Force Awakens and Rogue One were shitballs. |
|
|
|
Post by spartanmcdoodle on Feb 26, 2018 23:34:40 GMT
Last jedi would have been better if it was shorter. Some elements were cool as fuck, some missed the mark massively.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Feb 27, 2018 9:01:32 GMT
Last jedi would have been better if it was shorter. Some elements were cool as fuck, some missed the mark massively. As I said before, it's a good star wars film, but a shit 2nd part of a trilogy. Finn and Rose and their little adventure should have been cut. Lose purple hair, as there's already a perfectly good Admiral they could have not unceremoniously killed off that would have been more fitting to Star Wars And don't make luke a prick and kill him off. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 27, 2018 11:15:44 GMT
Last jedi would have been better if it was shorter. Some elements were cool as fuck, some missed the mark massively. As I said before, it's a good star wars film, but a shit 2nd part of a trilogy. Finn and Rose and their little adventure should have been cut. Lose purple hair, as there's already a perfectly good Admiral they could have not unceremoniously killed off that would have been more fitting to Star Wars And don't make luke a prick and kill him off. Don't be surprised if they kill off Chewbacca, C3PO and R2D2 next. All the old characters RIP.  |
|
|
|
Post by Alan-P on Feb 27, 2018 12:08:38 GMT
As I said before, it's a good star wars film, but a shit 2nd part of a trilogy. Finn and Rose and their little adventure should have been cut. Lose purple hair, as there's already a perfectly good Admiral they could have not unceremoniously killed off that would have been more fitting to Star Wars And don't make luke a prick and kill him off. Don't be surprised if they kill off Chewbacca, C3PO and R2D2 next. All the old characters RIP. You laugh, but it seems that is Kennedy's plan. |
|
I so much wish you would be wrong here...
